natural approach

TODAY IN THE CLASS WE TALKED ABOUT THE NATURAL APPROACH, I AGREE WITH SANDRA, I THINK THAS IS VERY IMPORTANT TO LEARN WITH REALLY SITUATIONS, THE AQUISITION OR LEARNING LANGUAGES ARE TWO DIFFERENTS TOPICS, I THINK THAT THE ACQUISITION IS "an unconscious process developed through using language meaningfully" THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM LANGUAGE LEARNING THAT IS A "consciously learning or discovering rules about a language"...
OUR CLASS WAS VERY INTERESTING, IS VERY IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHAT THING THE OTHER PERSONS ABOUT THIS TOPIC.

http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/languagelearning/waystoapproachlanguagelearning/thenaturalapproach.htm

hello everyone
firstable I'm going to mention the following:
I'm agree with my classmates in that the learning a second language based on real situations is very important because, it's one of the principal proposals of the direct method and set aside grammar aspects but, the principal problem is how created those real situations on the classroom? this is agood question
the link is the following:(with document on PDF)
http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=117535

hello!!!!!
well I had learned all comments but talking about natural approach, there is another important aspect in language acquisition and that is adults and L2 because not is the same thing a children than an adult because of many reasons.
according to Krashen, he said that adults just carry out learning for a language, children can take both ways learning and acquisition.
we know that learning is some conscius and we have to knowing about rules (grammar), and acquisition is some inconscius, it is intuitive.
for that this method is and will be a good learning method just depending to the teacher!!!
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=natural+approach+krashen&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart